Art Deco Marble Tiles In Soft Pastels iPhone Case - Free Shipping

Our iPhone Slim Case combines premium protection with brilliant design. The slim profile keeps your tech looking sleek, while guarding against scuffs and scratches. Just snap it onto the case and you’re good to go.Extremely slim profile, One-piece build: flexible plastic hard case, Open button form for direct access to device features, Impact resistant, Easy snap on and off, iPhone 8, 8 Plus, and X cases support QI wireless charging (case doesn’t need to be removed).

YouTube is the latest company to enable HDR for the iPhone X after Netflix turned the capability on with iOS 11 in September 2017. Representatives for YouTube did not immediately respond to CNET's request for comment. Google's streaming service joins Netflix in enabling better picture performance from users of Apple's flagship smartphone. YouTube has rolled out high dynamic range (HDR) to users of the iPhone X, enabling improved contrast and color on HDR-enabled YouTube videos. As spotted by Macrumors, videos like those from the popular HDR Channel, are now able to be viewed in HDR mode. Neither the iPhone X nor the Apple TV are able to output the videos in 4K, however.

Samsung has already been found to infringe Apple's patents, The argument centers on how much it owes Apple for copying some of its patented features, like the rectangular shape of the iPhone, Previously, Samsung paid $548 million, and $399 million of that is being reconsidered in this trial, The South Korean company hopes to pay less by using a Supreme Court decision that changed how the parties may calculate the damages, Samsung will argue that the elements it infringed were just a minor part of the phone, Here's an easier way to think about that point of view: If a company owns a patent on just a car's cup holder, it shouldn't be able to collect the profit from the entire art deco marble tiles in soft pastels iphone case car, Some estimates say more than 250,000 patents go into a smartphone, The original penalty was based on the value of the entire Samsung phone..

Apple, meanwhile, will seek to show that because a Samsung device infringed part of the iPhone's design, Samsung should pay damages based on the value of its entire device. That's because, Apple will argue, if one phone's design is similar to an iPhone, Apple could lose the sale to the competing phone. Apple wants to collect all of Samsung's profits on the long-defunct mobile devices that infringed. Yeah, we know. It does seem like this has been going on forever. The original Apple v. Samsung trial in 2012 captivated Silicon Valley and the tech industry because it exposed the inner workings of two notoriously secretive companies. It was just one of many cases around the world as the rivals sparred both in the marketplace and in the courtroom.

In August 2012, a nine-person jury sided with Apple on a majority of its patent infringement claims against Samsung, At that time, art deco marble tiles in soft pastels iphone case the jury awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages, much less than the $2.75 billion sought by the Cupertino, California, electronics giant, Samsung, which asked for $421 million in its countersuit, didn't get anything, District Court Judge Lucy Koh, in striking $450.5 million off the original judgment against Samsung, ordered a new trial to begin in November 2013 to recalculate some of the damages in the case, Samsung ultimately paid Apple $548 million in damages in December 2015..

The amount was based on the total profits Samsung made from its infringing devices. In this case, Samsung sold 10.7 million infringing devices, generating $3.5 billion in revenue. Only $399 million of the $548 million paid to Apple -- considered the "additional remedy" amount under Section 289 of the Patent Act of 1952 (35 U.S.C. 289) -- is being examined in the 2018 retrial. The additional $149 million in damages Samsung paid Apple isn't at stake. Now that the Supreme Court has said damages can be based on a portion of a product, not necessarily the entire infringing device, Samsung hopes the jury will award a smaller damages amount to Apple.

Jurors will look at five patents in total, The design patents are for a black, rectangular, round-cornered front face (D'677); a similar rectangular round-cornered front face plus the surrounding rim, known as the bezel (D'087); and a colorful grid of icons (D'305), The utility patents are the '381 patent, which covers Apple's "rubber band" bounce-back effect when users scroll to the bottom art deco marble tiles in soft pastels iphone case of a window; and the '163 patent, which covers "touch-to-zoom" that lets a user enlarge and center portions of a Web page, photo or document..

None that most of you will even remember (kudos to anyone who recalls the time Samsung had a different Galaxy name for each US carrier). The 16 products are the Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S II AT&T, Galaxy S II T-Mobile, Galaxy S II Epic 4G, Galaxy S II Skyrocket, Galaxy S Showcase, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize and Vibrant. In December 2015, Samsung asked the Supreme Court to examine the decisions reached by lower courts. It wanted the nation's highest court to determine whether design patent damages could be based on part of a device, not the entire gadget.

The court accepted the request and held a hearing in October 2016 -- the first time it had examined a design patent case since the 1800s, It ultimately agreed with Samsung and said damages could be determined differently than in the past, Apple and Samsung faced off at the Supreme Court in October 2016, That ruling reshaped the value of designs and how much one company may have to pay for copying the look of a competitor's product, Previously, an infringing "article of manufacture" was considered an entire device, Now an article of manufacture can be only a small portion of art deco marble tiles in soft pastels iphone case a device, which would limit the amount of damages that can be awarded..

Recent Posts