Travel And Enjoy iPhone Case - Free Shipping

Our iPhone Slim Case combines premium protection with brilliant design. The slim profile keeps your tech looking sleek, while guarding against scuffs and scratches. Just snap it onto the case and you’re good to go.Extremely slim profile, One-piece build: flexible plastic hard case, Open button form for direct access to device features, Impact resistant, Easy snap on and off, iPhone 8, 8 Plus, and X cases support QI wireless charging (case doesn’t need to be removed).

Less popular all round will be how the phone actually feels. The bezel is reinforced around the sides, such that it feels slightly sharp when you grip the stainless steel body. It does make the device feel more sturdy, but its not worth the discomfort. I did get used to it after a few days, but was reminded of it every time I felt the gentle touch of another phone. There's no lack of trying on Nokia's part here. But not all of its design swings here hit the mark. In an era where the $529 OnePlus 6 has the same processor as the latest Samsung Galaxy, a phone's camera is often where it sets itself apart. Here's where the Sirocco fails most.

On the back of the Sirocco you'll find two 12-megapixel cameras with Zeiss' branding of approval, while a 5-megapixel shooter sits on the front, I was pleasantly surprised by the front camera, If you've got lighting on your side, you can get some well balanced and detailed photos, I did sometimes struggle with overexposure, but issues like that almost always come along with selfie cameras, The rear cameras don't travel and enjoy iphone case have an excuse, though, Let's start with the portrait shots, All premium phones have a bokeh mode, where the background is blurred to foreground the subject, The Sirocco does too, except it comes in the form of a slider, As you slide a button from left to right, the bokeh effect intensifies, This would be fine as an additional feature, but as the sole way to take these portrait shots, it requires far more work from you than do other phones..

Left is the Sirocco, right is Huawei's P20 Pro. When you have optimal lighting conditions -- there was a window right behind me -- and a subject that's standing still (thanks, Katelyn!), the Sirocco can capture some terrific photos. However, things get significantly more tricky in imperfect conditions. The Nokia's portrait (L) looks drastically less balanced in this neutral-environment shot than the P20 Pro's. More troublingly, the Nokia 8 Sirocco's cameras are finicky. It takes time to get the slider in just the right spot, and this becomes exponentially more tricky if your subject is moving even slightly. Finally, other phones will tell you if you're standing too close or too far from your subject to actually snag -- this one doesn't, making that perfect portrait even more elusive.

The first great smartphone of 2015, Beautiful and bold..with complications, The new no-compromise MacBook, A stellar on-ear headphone, Crave-worthy curves for a premium price, The Good The Nokia 8 Sirocco is fast, feels sturdy, has a long battery life and runs the sleek Android One operating system, The Bad It lacks any standout features to justify its premium pricing, The Nokia 8 Sirocco's camera isn't reliable enough, and its design, travel and enjoy iphone case while improved over the regular Nokia 8, feels stout and a little outdated..

At a patent infringement damages trial, Greg Joswiak, Apple's vice president of product marketing, answers questions from Apple attorney Bill Lee about Apple's history of product design. Where do cars come in? To help jurors wrap their brains around the issue's complexities, each side is steering them to consider simpler analogies involving cars. How the jury decides will help determine whether design patents increase in power -- and likely in number too, as companies scramble to cash in on their ideas for styling and ornamentation. Such an increase could help the powers in tech stay powerful. And for Samsung specifically, it'll determine whether the company pays the $28 million penalty it thinks is fair for its design patent infringement or the $1.07 billion Apple wants.

So it's a big deal, Let's walk through some of the details about what's happened since this case began in 2011, what happened this week, and what happens next, We'll start with the car thing, In October 2017, US District Judge Lucy Koh ordered Samsung and Apple to use a four-factor test to determine the article of manufacture to which a design patent applies -- and thus on which profits are calculated to determine the design patent infringement penalty, The central point in the case is how to determine what penalties Samsung owes, travel and enjoy iphone case The statute governing design patents means the South Korean electronics giant must forfeit profits from sales of the "article of manufacture" that infringed Apple's patents, Samsung lost to Apple in 2012 on whether it infringed, but it prevailed with an appeal to the Supreme Court, which determined in 2016 that those profits could come from a component of a product, not from the full product..

How you determine what exactly constitutes that artifact of manufacture is pretty confusing, though. District Judge Lucy Koh, who's overseen all four of the trials in the Northern California District in this case, has adopted a laborious four-factor test to assess what the article of manufacture is and thus whether Samsung must pay its penalty on full phones or just some components. Samsung and Apple have fixated on different car analogies for the situation. During an earlier trial, a Samsung expert witness said a penalty based on the full product would mean somebody who infringed a patented cup-holder design would have to pay damages based on profits from the sale of the whole car.

Apple attorney Bill Lee, during closing arguments Friday, said that's ridiculous, "Samsung wants you to believe if Ford had decided to rip off the [Volkswagen] Beetle shape., the right article of manufacture would have been the exterior shell of the car," he said, Instead, the artifact of manufacture would be the entire car in that case, and the entire phone in Samsung's case, That brings us to another issue: what exactly Apple patented, One factor in the four-factor test is what's actually claimed in the patent, and Apple and Samsung tussled over the issue, Design patents show what's designed in images, with solid lines for the covered area and dashed or broken lines for areas not covered, The patents are very clear on the matter: "The broken lines in the figures show portions of the electronic device that form no part of the claimed design."One Samsung witness, designer Sam Lucente, emphasized this point by showing two of Apple's design patents -- US Patent No, D618,677 (D'677 for short), which describes a black, rectangular, round-cornered front face for an electronic device, US Patent No, D593,087 (D'087), which describes a similar rectangular round-cornered front face plus the surrounding bezel -- edited to remove the travel and enjoy iphone case dotted-line material altogether..

Recent Posts