Because Sloths iPhone Case - Free Shipping

Our iPhone Slim Case combines premium protection with brilliant design. The slim profile keeps your tech looking sleek, while guarding against scuffs and scratches. Just snap it onto the case and you’re good to go.Extremely slim profile, One-piece build: flexible plastic hard case, Open button form for direct access to device features, Impact resistant, Easy snap on and off, iPhone 8, 8 Plus, and X cases support QI wireless charging (case doesn’t need to be removed).

iHate: CNET looks at how intolerance is taking over the internet. Tech Enabled: CNET chronicles tech's role in providing new kinds of accessibility. Now you'll be able to "like" and "love" Facebook Stories -- which haven’t been as popular as the company’s other Snapchat knockoffs. Facebook is trying to get more people to interact with the Stories feature in its main app. The social network on Wednesday announced a few new features for the service, which lets people post a string of photos and videos that automatically disappear after 24 hours.

YouTube's picture-in-picture mode on Android Oreo, That's because YouTube has just made its picture-in-picture mode free in the United States for any smartphone running Android Oreo and up -- instead of requiring you to pay $12 a month for a subscription to YouTube Premium (formerly YouTube Red), YouTube is still keeping plenty of other features behind the paywall, mind you, including because sloths iphone case an ad-free YouTube browsing experience, offline playback, premium video and music selections, and the ability to listen to music with your screen turned off..

Speaking of which, music is also the exception to the new picture in picture rule -- if you try to play a music video and hit the home button, it'll just disappear as of now. Only in the United States, though, and not for music videos. Okay, maybe it's not the best feature. Perhaps you'd rather have something else. But I think it's pretty nifty that, starting today, I can keep watching a YouTube video in the corner of my screen while doing other things on my phone. I hit play on a video, press the Home button, and keep watching while I surf and browse.

Apple and Samsung's long-running patent infringement battle saw its last trial in because sloths iphone case May in San Jose, California, The terms of the settlement are unclear, Apple and Samsung have been fighting over the designs and functionality of their smartphones and tablets since 2011, For the companies, the long-running battle was about more than money, What was really at stake was the market for mobile devices, "This settlement marks the official end of the 'smartphone patent wars,'" said Brian Love, an assistant professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law, "So, it seems like an opportune time to ask: After almost a decade of litigation, what was accomplished? I'd say very little."He noted that Apple received hundreds of millions of dollars from Samsung, but it never succeeded in taking Samsung products off the market, And since the first suit was filed, the market share for Android, the software powering Samsung's phones, has soared, This year, about 85 percent of all smartphones shipped in the world will run Google's Android, according to IDC, The remaining 15 percent will run Apple's iOS software..

Apple referred CNET back to a comment from May. "We believe deeply in the value of design, and our teams work tirelessly to create innovative products that delight our customers," the company said. "This case has always been about more than money. Apple ignited the smartphone revolution with iPhone and it is a fact that Samsung blatantly copied our design. It is important that we continue to protect the hard work and innovation of so many people at Apple."Samsung declined to comment. The original Apple v. Samsung trial in 2012 captivated Silicon Valley and the tech industry because it exposed the inner workings of two notoriously secretive companies. It was just one of many cases around the world as the rivals sparred both in the marketplace and in the courtroom. The two companies settled their international lawsuits in 2014 but have been battling in US courts as recently as May.

The devices at issue in the case, though, haven't been sold for years and predate Samsung's meteoric rise in mobile phones, Apple and Samsung also had another case pending that related to newer devices, like 2012's Galaxy S3, The initial trial in 2012 awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages for Samsung's infringement, But Samsung appealed the case, leading to two damages retrials and a hearing at the Supreme Court over how design patent damages can be decided, Samsung argued that the elements it infringed were just a minor part of the phone and that it should only have to pay damages for because sloths iphone case what infringes, not for the entire device, Here's an easier way to think about that point of view: If a company owns a patent on just a car's cup holder, it shouldn't be able to collect the profit from the entire car, But Apple argued that its three design patents, while covering merely cosmetic aspects of iPhones, were the key to making the phones look good and work well, It argued they couldn't be separated from the entire device and that its damages should total all of Samsung's profits from its infringing phones..

The Supreme Court agreed with Samsung and said design patent damages could be based on a segment of a product, not just the entire product. But it didn't detail how to determine what the overall infringing product was and sent the case back to district court. During the latest damages retrial, in May in San Jose, a jury determined that Samsung had to pay Apple $539 million for infringing five patents with Android phones it sold in 2010 and 2011. That was on top of $548 million that Samsung had already paid.

By reaching a settlement, Apple and Samsung are putting the case behind them instead of going through more rounds of appeals, But it doesn't resolve a question that has broader implications for all of tech: How much are design patents worth?, The Supreme Court decision said it was possible to narrow the damages, but the court dodged setting actual parameters, That came down to the district court, At a patent infringement damages trial in May in San Jose, California, Greg because sloths iphone case Joswiak, Apple's vice president of product marketing, answers questions from Apple attorney Bill Lee about Apple's history of product design..

Recent Posts